« Curb your IE8 enthusiasm | Main | Will wind farms wed server farms? »
Painting by numbers is pretty nonsense
A promotional event for an online security
specialist is hardly an occasion that springs to mind as likely to provoke a
discussion about the nature and meaning of Art. But one last week staged by
MessageLabs actually took the form of an art exhibition, called Infected Art, Bringing Cyber Threats to Life.
It's when they talk about what they are
doing that I have problems: so often they spout what sounds to me like
codswallop, or cite meanings so trite as to be hardly worth expressing.
The MessageLabs exhibition has some
striking images by "computational artist" Alex Dragulescu, apparently
derived from the malware code supplied by the company. A sort of painting by
numbers, in fact.
Dragulescu was not there to explain himself
but it seems the pictures derived at least in part from different squiggles
being assigned to different machine-code operations.
"They're pretty nonsense,"
I said to the Messages Labs men showing me round. They looked hurt.
"They might be useful," suggested
one, arguing that the pictures might help researchers spot viruses, or
understand them better. Even he did not sound convinced.
The pictures, like the one above 'depicting' the Netsky email worm, will certainly be useful as a
bit of fun to brighten up dull screeds on the latest web threats. They
are faintly reminiscent of pictures of real micro-organisms, but nothing like as
interesting.
It's like those concoctions of metal you see in galleries supposedly reflecting aspects of the machine age. None
of them so wondrous as the real thing: a viaduct, a steam train, a dam, an oil
platform, or the workings of a mechanical watch.
Posted by Clive Akass on March 12, 2008 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/24766/27036314
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Painting by numbers is pretty nonsense:
Comments
I actually saw an ad for Message Labs in the Economist using one of these images. It caught the eye, so from a marketing perspective maybe not such a bad move?
Posted by: economist reader | 17 Mar 2008 11:14:40
Absolutely. There will be a picture in our next edition too
Posted by: Clive Akass | 18 Mar 2008 11:52:14


